Kijakuha

…Those who criticized the theory of the present-formation theory, based on the understanding that mind, nature, substance, and action are one and the same as the present-formation school, include Ouyang Chongyi (Nanye), Qian Dehong (Oshan), and Zou Shouyi (Dongkuo), while those who criticized the theory of the present-formation theory by distinguishing mind, nature, substance, and action include Luo Hongxian and Nie Shuangjiang (Bao). The latter are also known as the Return to Silence school, and within the Yangming school, their ideological structure is closest to that of Neo-Confucianism. Within the Wang school, the Return to Silence school and the present-formation theory school engaged in the most heated debate, sandwiched between the moderate school, which was the majority in terms of influence.…

*Some of the terminology explanations that refer to the "Kijakuha" are listed below.

Source | Heibonsha World Encyclopedia 2nd Edition | Information

…心･性，本体･作用などは現成派と同じく渾一と理解したうえで，現成論を批判した人々に欧陽崇一(南野)，銭徳洪(緒山)，鄒守益(東廓)などがあり，心･性，本体･作用などを分別して現成論を批判した人々に羅洪先，聶双江(豹)などがあった。後者は帰寂派ともいわれ，陽明学派内では思想構造が朱子学にもっとも近い人々である。王門内では勢力上は多数を占めていた中間派をはさんで，帰寂派と現成論派がもっとも激しい論争を展開した。…

※「帰寂派」について言及している用語解説の一部を掲載しています。

出典｜株式会社平凡社世界大百科事典 第２版について | 情報