Amzurek, P.

…Schreier and Kaufmann tried to connect it with Kelsen's pure jurisprudence. In Phenomenological Method and Legal Theory (1964), P. Amselek, while regarding pure jurisprudence as being close to the formal reduction method of phenomenology, argued for the need to distinguish between the phenomenology of law based on this method and the phenomenology of legal theory based on the transcendental reduction method. However, unlike Husserl's transcendental reduction, this is merely a description of the lawyer's practical attitude toward legal phenomena. After the war, research on Husserl's phenomenology progressed significantly, with particular attention being paid to his middle and late thought, and the phenomenology of the intersubjective world and existential phenomena were developed. Building on this trend of modern development across many fields are W. Luijpen's Phenomenology of Natural Law (1967) and N. Luhmann's Sociology of Law (1972), which critically inherited the functionalism and structuralism of A. Schütz and T. Parsons. …

*Some of the terminology referenced in "Amzurek, P." is listed below.

Source | Heibonsha World Encyclopedia 2nd Edition | Information

…シュライアーとカウフマンはケルゼンの純粋法学との接合を試みた。アムズレクP.Amselekは《現象学的方法と法理論》(1964)で純粋法学を現象学の形相的還元の方法に近いものとしつつも，この方法に拠る法の現象学と超越的還元の方法に拠る法理論の現象学との区別の必要を論じたが，その超越的還元はフッサールのとは違い，法現象に対する法律家の実践態度の記述にすぎない。戦後フッサール現象学の研究は著しく進み，とくに中･後期の思想が注目され，間主観的世界の現象学や実存現象が展開され，その多方面にわたる現代的展開の流れの上にロイペンW.Luijpenの《自然法の現象学》(1967)や，シュッツA.SchützやT.パーソンズの機能主義･構造主義を批判的に継承したルーマンN.Luhmannの《法社会学》(1972)がある。…

※「アムズレク，P.」について言及している用語解説の一部を掲載しています。

出典｜株式会社平凡社世界大百科事典 第２版について | 情報